Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
In the case of NDPH, a well designed and controlled pilot study using botulinum toxin A is needed for validation of my finding in this report.
This trial is a well-designed pilot study to achieve biochemically and clinically relevant outcomes.
Therefore, a well-designed pilot intervention is needed that focuses on the development of an intervention, the implementation process, and attitudes of users and providers.
However, in reference[3] it is clearly demonstrated that the well designed disjoint pilot symbols outperform the phase shifted pilot symbols.
In fact, specifically designed pilot clinical trials as well as data derived from emergency contraception studies indicate that early luteal phase administration of mifepristone is highly effective in preventing pregnancy, with minimal disturbance of hormonal parameters or menstrual cyclicity.
Our experience in reviewing submissions to a research ethics board also shows that most of the pilot projects are not well designed: i.e. there are no clear feasibility objectives; no clear analytic plans; and certainly no clear criteria for success of feasibility.
When all subcarriers are available for transmission, training OFDM preamble and pilot symbols have been well designed to enhance the channel estimation accuracy, see e.g., [6] and references therein.
Pilot studies should be well designed with clear feasibility objectives, clear analytic plans, and explicit criteria for determining success of feasibility.
In this article, we optimally allocate power to the preamble as well as design pilot symbols to estimate the channel in OFDM systems with null subcarriers.
A particular attention was paid at designing a well validated laboratory scale pilot in order to optimise oxidant concentrations and UV fluence.
The calibrated reservoir model was used to design a multi-well pilot at the site to validate the performance prediction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com