Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a weakly solution" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "a weak solution"? You can use "a weak solution" in contexts related to mathematics or physics, particularly in discussions about differential equations or variational problems.
Example: "In this study, we will demonstrate the existence of a weak solution to the given boundary value problem."
Alternatives: "a generalized solution" or "a weak form solution".
Exact(1)
Hence, (2.7), (2.9) and (2.11) imply that I ˜ ′ ( u n ) weakly converges to I ˜ ′ ( u ) in X ∗ and I ˜ ′ ( u ) = 0. So, it is not difficult to see that u ≥ 0 and I ′ ( u ) = I ˜ ′ ( u ) = 0, which means that u is a weakly solution of equation (1.1).
Similar(59)
A feasible point is said to be a weak Pareto solution (a weakly efficient solution, a weak minimum) of (NMP) if there exists no other such that (1.9).
A feasible solution is called a weakly maximal solution of if.
A feasible solution x ∗ of (FP) is said to be a weakly efficient solution of (FP) if there does not exist any feasible solution x of (FP) such that ϕ ( x ) < ϕ ( x ∗ ).
Obviously, is a globally efficient solution of (VEPC), then is also a weakly efficient solution of (VEPC).
Since ( u, λ, μ ) is a feasible solution for (D), ( u, λ, μ ) is a weakly efficient solution for (D).
Let ( u, λ, μ ) be a weakly efficient solution of (D), and let a be a feasible solution of (P).
Proof Suppose, contrary to the result, that u is not a weakly efficient solution of (P).
Proof Suppose, contrary to the result, that x ¯ is not a weakly efficient solution for (CVP).
Proof Since x ¯ is a (weakly) efficient solution for (CVP), then by Lemma 3, x ¯ is a (weakly) efficient solution for (G-CVP).
Proof To prove the result by contradiction, suppose that x 0 is not a weakly efficient solution of (CSVVEP).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com