Suggestions(1)
Exact(5)
A weak but significant difference (P = 0.029, table 1 and supplementary table S2, Supplementary Material online) in HSR density among the five categories was found.
To clarify this point, we focused on Proteobacteria by testing for equality of the median residuals of pathogens and non-pathogens; we obtained a weak but significant difference.
When individual ILAR subtypes were compared, there was a weak but significant difference between the patients with systemic and persistent oligoarticular disease (p = 0.031) in a post hoc analysis, although sample sizes were again small (table 2).
Although no significant correlation was observed, we found a weak but significant difference in HSR density between the genes with connectivity at the top 30% and bottom 30% (3.49 in bottom vs. 3.75 in top, Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0067), whereas no significant difference was found in the control (0.94 at the bottom vs. 0.95 at the top, Wilcoxon test, P = 0.81).
A weak but significant difference in genotype distribution of MMP-2−1306C>T MMP-2−1306C>Tandinomas, classified accordingastrice Borrmann carcinomastion, was observed with the highest perclassified the CC genotype in type 1/2 (fungaccordingeceding infiltoatheg tumours (type 3/4).
Similar(55)
The difference in amplitude change between the groups is significant (P = 0.014), and we found a weak but significant correlation of the amplitude change with the distance of the attentional focus from the cRF center (r = 0.163; P = 0.021).
A weak but significant negative correlation was found between IL-6 and cognitive performance.
A weak but significant adsorption was observed at 20 °C (Kd < 0.31 L/kg).
For Ki67 and p53, higher levels of expression showed a weak but significant poor prognostic effect whilst high bcl2 showed a weak but significant poor prognostic effect.
In strain MY6, a weak but significant positive correlation was found (rs = 0.44, p < 0.01).
We found a weak, but significant, correlation between the two measurements (ρ = 0.18; P ≈ 0).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com