Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
However, figure 4 A was better suited for clustering because the grouping was 2D rather than linear.
In our cohort, it was obvious that the survival rate of Group A was better than that of Group B. We found that patients with synchronous primary cancers had a better survival than those with metastasis.
However, the 2-year overall survival rate in Group A was better than those in Group B and Group C, and the protocol used in Group A may therefore be an effective CRT protocol be one of for esophageal cancer.
So, for example, A being better than C, was labelled as easy because it required participants to remember that A was better than B and B was better than C. However understanding that A was better than D meant recalling A was better than B, B better than C, and C better than D, and so was defined as hard.
While participants learnt these during their training period, they were not explicitly taught that because A was better than B, and B better than C, that they should infer A to be better than C, for example.
Using the data from a single repetition of the Riniker Landrum benchmark, the following comparison value was used for each pair of fingerprints A and B: the net difference between the number of protein targets for which the evaluation method for fingerprint A was better than fingerprint B minus the number of targets where it was worse.
Similar(50)
The STEREO-A SEP event started approximately 4 h earlier than the GOES event and approximately 8 h earlier than the STEREO-B event because STEREO-A was better connected to the source than the other two spacecraft.
Although, a human study indicated that acid citrate dextrose solution A (ACD-A) was better than sodium citrate (SC) for PRP preparation [ 12], there is no information regarding the effect of the type of anticoagulant used for PRP preparation in horses on cell counts from PRP or growth factor release from PRG.
A deal was better than a disaster.
A shorter skirt was better.
"It was better for a while".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com