The phrase "a view of the intellect" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing perspectives, opinions, or insights related to intellectual matters or cognitive processes.
Example: "In her essay, she presents a view of the intellect that emphasizes the importance of critical thinking in education."
Alternatives: "perspective on the mind" or "insight into intelligence".
So I emailed Cook, who hosts KLZ's Grassroots Radio Colorado, and I asked why she had such a low view of the intellect of Jeffco teens.
This has seemed to modern commentators to imply an Averroist view of the intellect as a separate, universal entity [Corti (1983), 3 37], and the lines which follow (30 56), where the vertú of the sensitive soul displaces reason and "assumes its function," presenting to the will an object whose desirability threatens a fatal disorientation, sustain this impression.
The alternative presented by the Buddha is a view of the self that regards it as a continuously changing array of five psycho-physical aggregates (the physical body, sensation, perception, intellect, and consciousness) without an inner core.
This is in direct contrast with Kant's view of the intellect as opposed to instinct; instead, it is just another instinct.
Albert explicitly rejects the Averroist view of the active intellect as itself a celestial intelligence, a single, separate substance which actualizes in the passive intellect phantasms supplied by individual human minds.
Averroes held to the view of the Agent Intellect as a form of (earthly) forms throughout his life, though his understanding of the relationship between it and the forms on earth underwent change.
3. We view cultivation of the intellect through small-group interaction with fellow members and outside speakers as an object of associated effort.
That is the view presented in his Middle Commentary, which he may well have written after the Long Commentary, or, as more likely, after a first draft of it.[67] The Latin West had only the Long Commentary in translation, and was ignorant of the philosophical alternative view of the material intellect presented in the Middle commentary.
Peter Brimelow's mischaracterization of Julian Simon as a "light cavalryman of the intellect" is a vicious smear.
