The phrase "a very strong level" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a high degree or intensity of something, such as performance, quality, or emotion.
Example: "The team achieved a very strong level of performance during the competition, surpassing all expectations."
Alternatives: "a high degree" or "a significant level".
"I think there has been a very strong level of agreement about what needs to happen," he said.
He explains, Were seeing a very strong level of demand against a backdrop of very little investment into increasing supply. Olin believes the global titanium market can remain strong beyond 2009.
Beer: I think the point behind this notion that you are talking about is certainly there being a tight alignment, a very strong level of understanding about the two of our various perspectives is going to be valuable to the corporation.
Future sales are down a sizable 5 points, yet the HMI is still at 70. Present sales, which is the most heavily weighted component, fell 3 points to 67, also still a very strong level.
60% of all bases in the dataset overlapped at least once, suggesting a very strong level of coverage of the genome.
Masson trichrome staining also qualitatively revealed increased collagen deposition at minor and moderate levels in low-and medium-dose groups, respectively, but at a very strong level in the high-dose group.
Based on previous studies, we found that a very strong shading level, corresponding to a 90% reduction in full natural light (as measured by a Luxmeter, model ZDS-10, China) resulted in a substantial increase in pest and diseases damage.
Overall, considering all the three correlation measures, we could say that the LCCDC metric exhibits strong to very strong levels of positive correlation for at least 14 of the 18 real-world networks analyzed.
We conduct an exhaustive correlation analysis and observe the LCCDC to incur the largest correlation coefficient values with BWC (compared to other centrality metrics under three different correlation measures) and to hold very strong levels of positive correlation with BWC for at least 14 of the 18 real-world networks analyzed.
This supports the hypothesis that lightly reviewed publication is inefficient, and some moderate level of publication stringency is superior to either very weak or very strong levels.
Having such direct (n = 14) or vicarious (n = 405) experience in the past was a very strong indicator of level of knowledge (χ, p < 0.001).
