The phrase "a very low quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is of poor standard or inferior in nature.
Example: "The product received numerous complaints due to its very low quality, leading to a decline in sales."
Alternatives: "poor quality" or "subpar quality".
The result was a pair of jeans, he says, but it had a very low quality.
An advertiser with a very low quality score may have to bid so much for placement as to make it uneconomical.
A very low quality RCT showed little or no effect of BoNT-A in chronic cervicogenic headache [23].
Screen sharing hardly works yet, the conference admin can only get a very low quality view of participants' screens and participants cannot view the admin's screen.
Kyrch et al.'s review, according to the GRADE method, started from a "low" quality level, while Prodromos et al.'s review, including case series with historic (non-concurrent) controls, started from a "very low" quality level.
The principal idea of such schemes is that without the key the transform coefficients cannot be interpreted or decoded and therefore no access to the source material is possible (or only at a very low quality).
You can eke out more recording time by choosing a lower-quality setting: either a half-resolution mode (which still looks better than VHS) or a very low-quality mode called MPEG-4 (which gives you an hour of video or more).
The number needed to treat to benefit is 2 (95 % CI 1 to 4) (all very low quality evidence).
Using RDTs to support diagnosis did not have a consistent effect on the prescription of antibiotics, with some trials showing an increase in antibiotic prescription and some showing a decrease (very low quality evidence).
Five high quality RCTs indicated little or no effect of BoNT-A, and two very low quality RCTs suggested little or no difference between BoNT-A and placebo, both combined with physiotherapeutic exercise and analgesics, in patients with chronic neck pain [23].
Collectively the evidence specific to HIV ageing and rehabilitation (stream A) was low to very low quality as much of the evidence consisted of cross-sectional qualitative or quantitative studies (with no comparison group) or narrative reviews.
