Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a very bad quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has a significantly poor standard or characteristic.
Example: "The product was disappointing due to a very bad quality that did not meet my expectations."
Alternatives: "extremely poor quality" or "terrible quality".
Exact(3)
She tells me that flowers are of a very bad quality in China and that we are blessed in the UK with florists.
Since the link of the first relay to destination has a very bad quality, the first relay will not contribute to the performance of the systems.
And unlike any other industry, skepticism is a very bad quality for building the next-generation of compelling technology that can create a more abundant, just, and equal world.
Similar(57)
This figure shows the journal familiarity and the perceived journal quality of doctoral students on a scale from one (not familiar at all; very bad quality) to seven (very familiar; very high quality).
3.1 and 3.3 to 265 participants.18 In the questionnaire, we asked participants to provide their familiarity and quality assessments on a seven-point rating scale (e.g. also cf. Locke and Lowe 2008), ranging from one (not familiar at all; very bad quality) to seven (very familiar; very high quality).19.19
Regarding land quality, more than 45percentt of the converted land was reported by households as of a bad or very bad quality, while the corresponding figure for non-converted land is less than 4percentt.
Very bad quality," one beckoned to me with a wink.
As shown in Figure 3, for PVSs of middle quality, the subjectivity variation is higher; for sequences of very good or very bad quality, the subjects tend to reach a more consistent opinion with high probability.
"There are very bad quality spray paint there," she replies with a smile.
"The building materials were very bad quality -- people had only been living in there for a month and it was built in 2002".
Recall that this metric is within the limits from 0 (very bad quality) to 1 (perfect quality).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com