The phrase "a verification panel" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a group or interface is involved in confirming or validating information or processes.
Example: "The software includes a verification panel that allows users to check their entries before submission."
Alternatives: "a validation interface" or "a confirmation board".
Individual ratings were compiled and discussed at a verification panel meeting held in August 2012, where consensus was reached on overall impact assessments for all 15 studies.
Case summaries were then individually assessed against four impact criteria and discussed at a verification panel meeting where final group assessments of the impact of research projects were made and key influences of research impact identified.
A verification panel was established to review and assess the collated case study material, and provide an overall assessment of the policy and practice impact of each of the 15 projects.
The documentary checks lend confidence that the perspectives of the chief investigators and end-users were credible, while the verification panel process provides a well established and tested methodology for reaching expert consensus, and minimizing subjectivity of assessments.
The review of materials by the verification panel identified that an intervention's capacity to be packaged and change 'agents' trained in its delivery was particularly important, as evidenced by the rapid expansion of Mental Health First Aid and Tai Chi across respective practice settings.
The verification panel was made up of eight members of the research team: a mix of senior academics and policy makers, including international experts in the field of applied population health research.
Now, ironically, the Nixon Administration's prestigious verification panel, after lengthy study has concluded that no practicable amount of on‐site inspection would add assurance to a MIRV deployment ban.
The verification panel represents the so-called Contadora Group of eight Latin American states, the United Nations and the Organization of American States, as well as the five Central American countries.
Examination of patterns differentiating high, moderate and low (overall) impact intervention research at the verification panel and further thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified six key factors that particularly contributed to these impacts.
Those involved in funded projects (AB, CR) declared their potential conflicts of interest at the verification panel meeting prior to any group assessment of impacts, they did not assess the impacts of their own projects, and did not contribute to final group assessments of their work.
"I also would question establishment of a verification process".
