Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a variance with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a variance with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "a variance from" or "a variance in relation to." Example: "There is a variance from the original plan that needs to be addressed."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
At a variance with changes in body composition, markers of bone build-up (bone ALP, osteocalcin) and resorption (β-cross-laps) were stimulated with either therapeutic scheme.
Science
It is rather due to the structure of the variance, B10 males being characterized by a variance with a clear major axis (V1 expressing 70% of the variance) whereas variance is more spherically distributed in groups such as B6 HF (V1 expressing less than 40% of the total variance).
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
55 human-written examples
Costs caused by the residents prior to admission to the addiction ward showed a big variance with a maximum of €80 937 and a minimum of €6080.
Science
Variance increased with body size, thus a variance function with dry body weight as a covariate was included.
Prevalence ratios were obtained by Poisson regression, with a robust variance, with a 95% confidence interval [ 24, 25].
Science
The idea of adjusting the decay of a prior variance with a smoothing parameter was given by Maruyama and George (2011).
Science
Here, the error variance increased with final body weight; hence, a variance function with wet body weight as covariate was included.
a Variance associated with each IMF k obtained decomposing (Delta F_{mathrm{P}}) plotted as a function of the associated mean frequency (< f_k>).
Science
a Variance associated with each IMFk obtained decomposing (Delta F_{mathrm{C}}) plotted as a function of the associated mean frequency (< f_k>).
Science
Assuming a variance model with constant coefficient of variation, the SD is ∼32%.
Science
This included a segment-based analysis of sensitivity and specificity using a variance calculation with corresponding confidence intervals (c.i).
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming to express a divergence or difference, substitute "with" for "from" to establish a grammatically sound phrase, ensuring clarity and precision in your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "with" after "variance"; the correct preposition is "from." Using the wrong preposition can alter the intended meaning and create grammatical errors.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a variance with" functions as a prepositional phrase, intending to indicate a difference or deviation. However, it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that the correct usage is "a variance from".
Frequent in
Science
50%
News & Media
50%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "a variance with" is grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, the accurate preposition is "from." While the intention is to convey a difference or deviation, using the wrong preposition undermines clarity and precision. Alternative phrasing like ""a variance from"", ""a difference with"", or ""a divergence from"" should be used instead. Always ensure correct preposition usage to maintain grammatical integrity and clear communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
a variance from
Replaces 'with' with 'from' to create a grammatically correct prepositional phrase indicating deviation.
a difference with
Substitutes 'variance' with 'difference', maintaining a similar meaning but with common usage.
a departure from
Indicates a movement away from something usual or expected.
a divergence from
Uses 'divergence' to emphasize a departure or separation from a standard or norm.
a deviation from
Uses 'deviation' to show a departure from an established course or standard.
a discrepancy with
Employs 'discrepancy' to highlight an inconsistency or contradiction.
in contrast to
Highlights differences by setting up a comparison between two things.
at odds with
Expresses a state of conflict or disagreement, shifting the grammatical structure.
inconsistent with
Indicates a lack of alignment or agreement, altering the phrase's core components.
contrary to
Replaces the entire phrase with a more direct expression of opposition.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "a variance with"?
The correct phrasing is "a variance from". For example: "There is "a variance from" the original plan."
What's a good alternative to "a variance with"?
Instead of "a variance with", use phrases like "a difference with" or "a divergence from", depending on the specific meaning you wish to convey.
Is "a variance with" grammatically correct?
No, "a variance with" is not grammatically correct. The correct preposition to use with "variance" is "from". So you should use "a variance from".
How does "a variance from" differ from "a discrepancy with"?
"A variance from" generally implies a measurable or quantifiable difference, while "a discrepancy with" suggests an inconsistency or lack of agreement. Choose the phrase that best fits the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested