The phrase "a variance which is" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific type of variance in a formal or technical context, often in legal, statistical, or regulatory discussions.
Example: "The report outlines a variance which is significant enough to warrant further investigation."
Alternatives: "a variance that is" or "a variance which exists".
The Southampton building inspector, Paul Houlihan, said the cases are different because Mr. Rennert's house needed no special variances -- local rules set a minimum size for houses, not a maximum -- while the miniature golf course requires a variance, which is why he referred it to the zoning board.
(v) is a Gaussian function, evaluated in, with a peak in correspondence with the pixel in column of the scratch core, and a variance which is shown in (5).
As can be seen in Tables 1 3, the MLE provides a mean which is consistent with the true value and presents a variance which is nearly equal to zero.
If we increase the "local" weight, we increase the probability to include "good" pixels into the scratch to be restored (Figure 7 e)).,,, and are the same of (3). is the next upper (lower) pixel to be examined in the same column of. is a Gaussian function, evaluated in, with a peak in correspondence with the pixel in column of the scratch core, and a variance which is shown in (5).
Each channel tap is a zero mean complex random variable with a given variance which is determined from the power-delay profile of the channel.
For the standard filter runs where σ y 2 is assumed to be larger, the ESS estimate does not drop as severely as with a small σ y 2. This is due to the fact that, with a measurement variance which is assumed to be very high, more or less all possible simulated measurements are considered to fit well with the true measurements.
Fortunately, this prior can also be specified as a normally distributed marker effect conditional on a locus-specific variance, which is given a scaled inverted chi-square distribution.
This RSV value stems from a high nugget variance, which is expected with heavy metals in urban environments, since measurements can vary strongly from high to low over the shortest sample distances.
In the first model considered by Meuwissen et al. [ 5], the α j were iid normal variables with null mean and a common "known" variance, which is equivalent to our general model with π=0,, and set to the common known variance.
Genetic analyses showed that WMS (modeled as the Slope in the nLGC model) has a relatively small variance which is not due to genetic variation while PS (modeled as the Intercept in the nLGC model) showed large individual differences, part of which could be attributed to additive genetic factors.
We now, however, introduced moderation on the paths unique to T, with moderation parameters being either β a = .08, or β c = .10, or β e = .035 (As shown in Table 5, the power to detect moderation on E variance is much greater than the power to detect moderation of A or C variance, which is why β e was chosen much smaller than both β a and β c ).
