Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
The phrase "a validation error" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in contexts related to data processing, programming, or form submissions to indicate that the data provided does not meet the required criteria.
Example: "When I tried to submit the form, I received a message stating that there was a validation error with my email address."
Alternatives: "an input error" or "a data validation issue."
Exact(4)
All validation errors after partial training are saved and compose a validation error array.
A validation error is demonstrated with NM_001197320.1 c.281A>T, which specifies an incorrect reference nucleotide.
It was reported to be frustrating to have filled out a diary form and then not be able to send it because of a validation error.
As previously published [ 15] the discriminant model between centenarians and elderly group provided a validation error of the classifier (expressed as area under the ROC curve, AuROC) of 0.99 by using a 15.4% of the spectral variance (RX) (Table S1).
Similar(56)
A cross validation error was scored if a previously mapped SNP and a GBS tag disagreed on parent of origin.
They reported a cross validation error based on all samples, meaning this error was used to chose the correct number of components.
In the astrocytes dataset, we assessed a cross validation error of 17%, comparable to that of the neuroblastoma cell lines.
In addition, assessing accuracy for an independent validation set using the best model trained from the cross validations should be performed in order to estimate a true validation error.
The root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) of 0.040, 0.021, 0.063 and 0.074% w/w were obtained for glucose, fructose, saccharose and ethanol, respectively, and a mean relative validation error of 2.9, 2.1, 2.6 and 3.6% was achieved for glucose, fructose, saccharose and ethanol.
Six genes were selected from the prediction model achieving a minimum cross validation error with prediction accuracy of 89.6% on the training data (Tables 5 and 6).
In contrast, our 11 probesets signature showed a higher cross validation error when applied to dendritic cells (33%) and was not significantly enriched in the hypoxic phenotype (Table 3).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com