The phrase "a valid use of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing whether a particular application or interpretation of something is acceptable or appropriate.
Example: "In this context, using the term 'sustainable' is a valid use of the language, as it aligns with the principles of environmental responsibility."
Alternatives: "an acceptable application of" or "a legitimate use of".
Is this a valid use of a sponsor-owned unit?
As to the purpose of the cameras, the draft said that they would be used "to safeguard the District of Columbia," that they represented "a valid use of a government's power to protect its citizens" and that they would help the police "prevent crime and fear of crime".
After that we'll be able to transition to: Is this a valid use of VR? Does it move the art forward?
The tide turned in 1993, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Schisler v. Sullivan found that SSA's 1991 regulations on the opinions of treating physicians, while they departed in some ways from the court's earlier opinion, were a valid use of the agency's regulatory power.
The Court held that Section 5 constituted a valid use of Congress's power to enforce the Fifteenth Amendment, reasoning that "exceptional circumstances" of pervasive racial discrimination, combined with the inadequacy of case-by-case litigation in ending that discrimination, justified the preclearance requirement.
They felt that outreach participation hindered their ability to fulfill those responsibilities and might be an ineffective use of their skills and time, and that it was not a valid use of their research funding ".
Subsidies to encourage their development are a much more valid use of public funds than enriching oil and gas companies.
Therefore, to the valid use of an equation-based model in a stochastic simulation mandates that we know how to define a proper propensity function.
This kind of study contributes to advancing organizational research, allowing valid use of an instrument in different groups of individuals (Milfont and Fischer, 2010).
Thus, from a pure practical point of view, ignoring local dependence does not impair the valid use of EDS scores.
To obtain a valid estimate, use of sulfonylurea derivatives was chosen as the comparator because, in our opinion, a comparison should be made with participants with diabetes to reduce the risk of confounding by indication.
