The phrase "a valid election" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the legitimacy or acceptability of an electoral process.
Example: "The committee confirmed that the results were from a valid election, ensuring that all procedures were followed."
Alternatives: "a legitimate election" or "an acceptable election".
"Is an election with 5 percent turnout a valid election?" asked a Western diplomat in Kabul.
A foreign corporation that has made a valid election under section 897(i) to be treated as a domestic corporation for purposes of section 897 may provide a certification of non-foreign status pursuant to this paragraph (b)(3)(ii).
"If there has not been a valid election for more than 13 months," Mr. Shmulewitz said, "as few as 10percentt of the shareholders can trigger the mandatory calling of such a meeting".
For purposes or paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, the term "resident of the United States" includes an individual for whom a valid election is in effect under section 6013 (g) or (h) for the taxable year or years during which the physical presence requirement is satisfied.
An election under this subsection shall not be conducted in any unit within which a valid election under this subsection has been held during the preceding 12 calendar months or with respect to which a labor organization has been certified as the exclusive representative during the preceding 24 calendar months.
A valid election and smooth transition to a new government are seen as pivotal events for the legacy of the American war here, as the United States military plans to remove all combat troops by the end of August, leaving 50,000 troops in an advisory role through 2011.
"A valid elections cannot be held amidst such major issues," he told the local Haveeru newspaper.
Secessionists, after all, left the Union precisely because they rejected a constitutionally valid election that placed slavery, as Lincoln put it, "in the path of ultimate extinction".
Follow up question: how is your framing not partisan propaganda? 4. Since when does the valid election of a president constitute an attack on "our core institutions"?
Both parties used, by analogy, the Benedictine rule, which stated that in the case of a double election for abbot, the valid election was the one made by "the sounder part" (sanior pars) of the electors – but there was no consensus which part of the College was "sounder" in this case.
2. Why does the result of a valid democratic election signal a "profound shift"?
