Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a vague futuristic" is not correct in written English as it lacks a noun to complete the thought.
You can use it when describing something that is both unclear and related to the future, but it needs to be part of a larger phrase.
Example: "The artist's work had a vague futuristic quality that left viewers pondering its meaning."
Alternatives: "an ambiguous futuristic" or "a nebulous futuristic".
Exact(1)
We know it's bad for the planet, we know it's harmful to our species in a vague, futuristic sense.
Similar(59)
Strange to say about a vaguely futuristic novel, but "The Savage Girl" feels dated somehow.
Her film's wordless, trancelike sequences evoke a vaguely futuristic state of being adrift in space and time, a kind of designer jet lag.
Coming off like the musical equivalent of a George Saunders short story, "Sumday" gives voice to the trapped souls of a vaguely futuristic dystopia in which high-tech meets low class.
The key of both are self-serve kiosks, a vaguely futuristic crash course at Hamburger University.
I mean — minor spoiler alert — we have some sort of ultra weapons developed in secret and powered by some vague futuristic technology.
It wasn't until the 1920s that sans-serif came into wide use with typefaces like Futura and later, in the '50s, Helvetica, but they are now the typeface style of choice for any design job requiring a clean, vaguely futuristic aesthetic.
His words, stay with me, had seemed, to the boy, vaguely futuristic, a beam of light from a spaceship.
Yes? A: Vaguely.
The essay was illustrated with Smithson's black-and-white snapshots of the industrial Passaic River, and the piece reads like Smithson's version of Thomas Cole's "The Course of Empire," written and illustrated rather than painted, and infused with a vague sense of futuristic dystopia set in construction rubble.
She used a silver, plug-in percolator, which was one of those generic, vaguely futuristic appliances, like a Frigidaire.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com