The phrase "a univocal concept" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a concept that has a single, clear meaning without ambiguity.
Example: "In philosophy, a univocal concept is essential for establishing a clear argument."
Alternatives: "a singular concept" or "a clear-cut concept".
The key issues in all these areas are usually framed as though we have a univocal concept of causation, which applies to both mentalistic and physical phenomena.
As Pini notes, "[e]ven when Scotus comes to think that being is a univocal concept, he will always make clear that there is no one real mode of being corresponding to that concept from which the different categories can be derived.
Clearly autonomy is not a univocal concept and little agreement exits about its nature, scope or strength [ 11].
In employing a univocal conception of being as sheng, Chinese philosophies did not segregate self-generation from the world itself.
He then argued that 'being' (ens) was a univocal term subordinated to a single univocal concept.
This univocal concept is therefore a mistake, or an error, because nothing positive is really common to God and creatures, but only something negative, as the 'right' intellect subsequently acknowledges, when, going beyond the apparent initial indistinctness, it conceives in a distinct, separate way negatively indeterminate being and privatively indeterminate being.
The truth is that there is no univocal concept of war.
From this univocal concept of being, which signifies some determinate intelligible content distinct from other intelligible contents, he distinguishes an all-encompassing notion of being which signifies "everything positive which is outside of nothing, whether it is real being, or being in the mind, whether categorical, reducible to categories, or outside of all categories".
Both in academic reasoning and public health interventions health and healthy eating are usually discussed as universal and univocal concepts.
Except for Roger Bacon, who thought of proper names as constantly receiving new impositions (see §7), the reason had to do with the definition of a univocal term as involving a concept or a nature predicable, at least in principle, of several individuals.
Actually, several studies using protocols with paired associative stimulation over the motor or somatosensory cortex challenge the concept of an univocal correspondence between functional gain and enhancement of synaptic efficacy [30].
