Since all the three conclusions C1, C2 and C3 are rejected, the initial thesis T ('the universal exists') is also rejected.
Now, a universal either exists in reality independently of a mind conceiving of it, or it only exists in the mind.
Looking back at that gang, it reminds me of that Eco quote: "There exists a secret society with branches throughout the world, and its plot is to spread the rumour that a universal plot exists".
The line that struck me most was: "There exists a secret society with branches throughout the world, and its plot is to spread the rumour that a universal plot exists". .
However, obviously, all these questions presuppose that it is at all, namely, that such a universal entity exists.
A universal relationship exists between the torsion constant of a wire and the spring constant of a close-coiled helical spring wound from the same wire.
Instead of assuming that a universal model exists for all flow scales such as in a classically applied Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) approach, in this work the use of eddy-resolving techniques has been investigated.
In other words, a universal pool exists of all the information that humanity has gained throughout the ages.
The assumption that a universal value exists for α is clearly open to question and has been put in doubt by one study (Hashizume et al. 2008), where a distinctly nonlinear increase in rotavirus diarrhea above a certain temperature threshold is suggested.
But since it cannot exist in reality in either of these two ways, Boethius concludes that it can only exist in the mind.[10] However, to complicate matters, it appears that a universal cannot exist in the mind either.
