The phrase "a unitary view of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a perspective or understanding that is cohesive and singular regarding a particular subject or issue.
Example: "The researchers proposed a unitary view of the economic impacts of climate change, emphasizing the interconnectedness of various factors."
Alternatives: "a holistic perspective on" or "a comprehensive understanding of".
Much of the past discussion about reduction presupposes a unitary view of the scientific enterprise that involves a close relation between natural kinds, laws, counterfactual dependence, explanation, and confirmation (Godfrey-Smith 2008).
Whereas most early Stoics adopted a unitary view of the soul, Galen favored Plato's tri-partite model, for which he assigned various functions to different parts of the body.
For many years, we have witnessed a rebirth of a unitary view of psychosis, collapsing schizophrenia and psychotic affective illness into one disorder.
34 Like the eufrontality model, the DMN model assumes a unitary view of meditation as dispassionate, contentless, and nondiscursive mindfulness, and so is unlikely to apply equally to positive affective practices like compassion meditation.
Others defend a unitary view.
Says he: "Whatever Heisenberg's motivation, his invention of a unitary Copenhagen view on interpretation, at the center of which was his own, distinctively subjectivist view of the role of the observer, quickly found an audience" (p. 677).
The discussion of the 'unity of the virtues' in the Protagoras regardless of the perhaps intentionally unsatisfactory structure of his proofs confirms that Plato realized that a critique of the inconsistencies implied in the conventional values is insufficient to justify such a unitary point of view.
As semantically confusable objects are expected to engage the semantic system more than semantically simple objects, the unitary view predicts that the integrity of all anterior medial temporal lobe structures should be associated with a disadvantage for semantically confusable objects (compare Manns et al., 2003; Squire et al., 2004).
To make such recommendations would demand precisely the sort of global and unitary view that is no longer deemed possible.
Don Howard (2004) argues, however, that what is commonly known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, regarded as representing a unitary Copenhagen point of view, differs significantly from Bohr's complementarity interpretation.
Still, unlike Mr. Bush, Mr. Obama has not mentioned the Unitary Executive Theory, an expansive view of executive power that conflicts with Supreme Court precedent.
