Sentence examples for a unit of effectiveness from inspiring English sources

Loosely speaking, all the definitions, Bayesian or otherwise, relate to the probability that the treatment under consideration is cost-effective as a function of the value placed on a unit of effectiveness.

Incremental cost effectiveness ratios (ICERs), defined as the additional cost per patient achieving a unit of effectiveness compared with the next less costly, non-dominated option, were calculated for each treatment duration.

This valuation is performed by assigning a monetary value to a unit of effectiveness (Z), and multiplying it by the net number of units of effectiveness achieved.

It is the certainty, expressed as a probability, that the current evidence would lead us to believe that some new therapy is cost-effective, insofar as the ICER is less than the value ascribed to a unit of effectiveness.

In addition, the incremental net benefit [ 5- 9] (INB) is Δeλ-Δc, and is estimated by eλ - c, where λ is the value given to a unit of effectiveness.

Acceptability curves provide an excellent means of quantifying the stochastic uncertainty of the estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in relation to a particular value ascribed to a unit of effectiveness.

The incremental net benefit is calculated as Eλ – C. The first term is the number of units of effectiveness gained in the intervention group in comparison with the control group multiplied by the amount society is willing to pay (WTP) for a unit of effect gained.

23 The results are presented as an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ie, the cost of gaining an additional unit of effectiveness (overall success) with the most effective option (anidulafungin) compared with micafungin, caspofungin, and fluconazole.

The net benefit of each excavation strategy was estimated using the formula [ 28] with λ being the ceiling thresholds of willingness to pay, i.e. the additional costs a decision maker is willing to sacrifice for gaining an additional unit of effectiveness, i.e. an additional year of tooth retention [ 27].

Each willingness-to-pay value represents the maximum cost that a decision-maker is willing to pay for an additional unit of effectiveness [ 29, 30].

The outcomes projected from all 1,000 simulations were used to plot acceptability curves to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold for an incremental unit of effectiveness.