The phrase "a uniform interpretation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the need for consistency in understanding or analyzing a particular concept, rule, or text.
Example: "In legal contexts, it is essential to have a uniform interpretation of the law to ensure fairness and equality."
Alternatives: "a consistent interpretation" or "a standardized interpretation".
It surely would be a mistake, however, to look for a uniform interpretation of all megalithic monuments or even to speak of a distinct megalithic religion.
None of us alive today has any memory of this war, and so we should be wary of imposing a uniform interpretation on it.
A uniform interpretation of the term 'sale' is necessary in order to avoid the protection offered to copyright holders by that directive varying according to the national law applicable.
Although we are normally and properly reluctant to overturn our decisions construing statutes, we have done so to achieve a uniform interpretation of similar statutory language, Commissioner v. Estate of Church, 335 U.S. 632, 649-650, 69 S.Ct.
In the meantime, the Alabama Department of Homeland Security has been inviting state and county officials to regular meetings in Montgomery so that they can arrive at a uniform interpretation of the law, said John Schremser, a spokesman for the department.
Modern historians have not accepted a uniform interpretation of the cited texts.
With streets and statues honoring Lenin all over Russia, Putin's interpretation hardly contributes to a uniform version of history.
But that will not be possible if the European Commission insists on a strict and uniform interpretation of the standards imposed by Basel III.
154 First of all, the term 'reproduction' in Article 2 of the Copyright Directive is a concept of European Union law which must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation throughout the European Union (Infopaq International, paragraphs 27 to 29).
Thus, we think that state court adjudication of civil RICO actions will, in practice, have at most a negligible effect on the uniform interpretation and application of federal criminal law, cf. Pan-American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Delaware, Newcastle County, 366 U.S. 656, 665-666, 81 S.Ct.
Moreover, your rapporteur believes that EU legislation would ensure uniform interpretation, create a level playing field and would meet the increasing demand from consumers for better animal welfare in farming.
