Sentence examples for a typical systematic from inspiring English sources

We discuss how these systematic effects impact the precise orbit determination of LAGEOS geodetic satellites over a 1-year analysis, and additionally give a measure of the local effect into station coordinates, regarding in particular the effect in the east west component that is of 2 6 mm for a typical systematic time bias of one μs.

As a starting point we assume that a typical systematic review of trials will include the assessment of all appropriate trials for specific target populations undergoing particular interventions.

A typical systematic review usually consists of several parts: Title; Objectives; Background; Selection Criteria; Search Strategy Data Collection and Analysiss; Results; and Conclusions [ 3].

A typical systematic review is the product of a team that has taken responsibility for analyzing the literature in a specific clinical area, usually around a highly focused issue.

It has been estimated that a typical systematic review would take between six and eighteen months [ 18] but this is very dependent on the research question and the staffing, funding and other resources available.

For example, the AlzGene review evaluates the strength of the association between Alzheimer disease and genetic variations across the whole genome, whereas a typical systematic review would probably evaluate only a subset of such genetic variations (e.g., in the APOE gene).

Gartlehner and colleagues compared the approach suggest by Shekelle and colleagues of a limited search using review articles, commentaries and editorials, to a conventional process using typical systematic review methods in terms of comprehensiveness and effort [ 15].

Under more typical systematic review conditions, only one or a small number of related tests would be reported.

Future work is warranted to test the reliability in a narrower set of interventions, for example, those included in typical systematic reviews, or to develop the criteria further in order to achieve better consensus.

In contrast to typical systematic reviews, these address much broader questions and are updated on a weekly or monthly basis.

The Elements of Law, which Hobbes circulated in 1640, is the first work in which Hobbes follows his typical systematic pattern of starting with the workings of the mind and language, and developing the discussion towards political matters.