80% of fish populations in European seas are believed to be overexploited and generally the sea is in such bad shape that any type of conservation measure is welcomed.
These findings are significant for conservation policy because, unlike some past research, they indicate that renters are not resistant to all types of conservation practices, echoing recent studies finding an increase in conservation adoption among non-full-owners.
However, our aim here is not to suggest that sharing should be a higher priority than sparing, or vice versa, as a resolution to any particular type of conservation conflict.
Yet despite an extensive literature exploring the effects of conservation on human livelihoods, there is a lack of robust evidence about which type of conservation intervention works, for whom, and how.
This type of conservation phenomenon has been reported previously but to a lesser extent (17 conserved sites), following examination of the 76 common core residues of ~5300 Kabat sequences of antibodies to a full range of different antigen classes [ 53].
Focusing on the Dichaete binding intervals that are positionally conserved between species, we assessed whether this type of conservation is enriched at certain classes of functional sites, such as known CRMs or Dichaete target genes.
Furthermore, we study the type of conservation of TFos and observe that 47.67% and 57.01% of TFos conserved at the sequence level for human and mouse respectively have been repurposed and are active in cell types or bind different TFs.
Using complete network data among coastal fishers from six villages in Kenya, we apply this approach to select key players for each type of conservation objective.
We evaluate the distribution of restoration projects on the California Central Coast, USA, to evaluate sociopolitical and biophysical influences on the type and distribution of one type of conservation effort.
