Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a type kind" is not correct and is not usable in written English.
It seems to be a redundancy, as "type" and "kind" convey similar meanings.
Example: "This is a type kind of fruit that is rarely found in stores."
Alternatives: "a kind of" or "a type of".
Similar(58)
The example of homo sapiens suggests that perhaps a type is a kind, where a kind is not a set (for the reasons mentioned two paragraphs above).
Tucson isn't normally a Type-A kind of city, but for just a few weeks each year the adrenaline really surges.
He is a solitary type, a kind of loner who can make you laugh or smile about his misfortunes, and that allows me, through him, to touch on sad matters — but always with a light hand, without melodrama or sentimentality, because Doinel has a kind of courage about him.
I define identity as a type (or label, kind) of personhood, including the ways in which an individual and surrounding people view the person.
Because I would suggest that maybe 90percentt of the general population are more a Type 1. kind of person than a Type 2. – it is just very awkward, to talk to someone, cold, both of you knowing that the not-even-secret agenda to this conversation is to see each other's genitals – apart from literally every person in the Love Island villa, who are Type ii.
The concept of this area of nutritional proportioning is a creative application of the "typing" kind of diet.
The novel is an account of a type of life, a kind of loss, that I understand intimately.
As in a service comedy, each supporting character tends to be a type, which is a kind way of saying that each is a cliche.
The discovery is particularly important because it is a type 1a supernova, the kind used to measure the expansion of the universe.
A type may represent one kind of attribute or several and need include only those features that are significant for the problem at hand.
This is mainly due to the fact that the notion of a type or a natural kind is far from clear.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com