Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
With SNP A-type error introduced into the data, the uncorrected OR was 1.82 (95% CI: 1.17, 2.84) while the corrected OR was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.29, 3.45), close to the 'true' result.
One particular unfortunate who penned a hollow document entitled "Financial Stability in Iceland" struggles to explain why that smoking gun now appears on his CV as "Financial Instability in Iceland", insisting (unconvincingly) that it's a "typing error".
All Blacks team manager Darren Shand explained that the mistake was due to a "typing error," and Owens, after consulting with de Villiers, allowed Coles to continue playing.
No, these numbers are not a typing error.
This was due to a typing error.
Either an addition error or a typing error reversed a "7" and a "5" (i.e., 57 versus 75).
It might catch some member declared using a higher accessibility than actually required even if that happened by chance or as a result of a typing error.
The resulting exposure misclassification is a Berkson type error [ 36, 37].
We based sample size calculations on a type I error of 0.05, a type II error of 0.2, a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
It is therefore necessary to include ~90 subjects per group, considering a type I error <0.05 and a type II error of 20% (statistical power 80%).
A sampling error between 1%-2% and a type I error of 0.05 was used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com