Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a trusted source of information" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a person, organization, or medium that is reliable and credible in providing information.
Example: "In today's digital age, it's essential to rely on a trusted source of information to avoid misinformation."
Alternatives: "a reliable information provider" or "a credible source of data."
Exact(19)
Elders were rated as a trusted source of information; however, many elders are often not sufficiently informed to be able to provide health information [ 4].
A second motive could be that NGOs are often seen as a trusted source of information.
In short, they had already positioned themselves as a trusted source of information that people could turn to in times of crisis.
The three cable networks were not being compared to each other; instead, poll respondents were asked to compare each network to Trump as a trusted source of information.
In a disaster or public health emergency, NCDP serves as a trusted source of information to the media and the public.
"An FOI from HSJ is part of the furniture for a health organisation and they're happy to help because of our reputation as a trusted source of information," said Baker.
Similar(41)
I personally think the FT can suffer from this a bit, but as a result it is a highly trusted source of information; less so entertainment.
Research shows that the single greatest motivator to get a non-voter to the polls and/or to persuade a voter to support a chosen candidate is person-to-person contact from a neighbor, family member, co-worker or friend -- a reliable, trusted source of information.
Because the blockchain is effectively unhackable, it can work as a highly trusted source of information.
While the poll contains a series of interesting findings, maybe the most telling is the breakdown by party and age (and here, age and gender do matter) to the question of whom is a more trusted source of information -- the president or the news media.
"It's wrong and I think it demeans them and it makes them less of a valid, trusted source of information on the real issues that confront this debate".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com