Sentence examples for a true thickness of from inspiring English sources

It is clear that, to get the correct true thickness, the assumed average index has to be appropriate to the value of p. For example, a lens with a true thickness of 3.5 mm (Table 1) would have an optical thickness of 3.5 x 1.4076 = 4.9266 mm when p is 3, but 3.5 x 1.4119 = 4.9417 mm if p is 10.

Rolling to a true thickness strain of 2.66 resulted in the formation of a microstructure with a grain/subgrain size of ∼80 nm at 77 K or ∼200 nm at 293 K.

Microstructure evolution in commercial-purity titanium during plane-strain multipass rolling to a true thickness strain of 2.66 at 77 and 293 K was quantified.

One plausible factor for this discrepancy is that we estimate a true thickness measure between inner and outer surfaces of the SP, rather than simply taking an straight line distance between two fixed points on the inner and outer surfaces in 2D slices, which can yield different values (Jones et al. 2000).

This may limit the ability to more precisely measure the true thickness of these structures.

As the GR is measured along the total length of each well, the tops and bases of formations are given in measured depth (MD) and not in true vertical depth (TVD), which correspond to the length of the tube/drill and the true thickness of the sedimentary units (representing the vertical depth at the drilling entry point), respectively.

The simulated CT images also had a voxel size of 12 μm but due to partial volume artifacts and noise, in particular cortical thickness is overestimated for true thickness values of less than 48 μm.

The black squares in Figure 1 show the true thickness as a function of N. Figure 1 Fitting curve according to the function model is shown with a red solid line.

Should the nav value appropriate to p = 3 be applied to the p = 10 pathlength, the estimate of true thickness is 4.94165/1.4076 = 3.5107, an error of 11 μm.

The ICC values of RDT measurement between parallax radiograph and 3D analysis were close to 0.75 in the present study, suggesting that the parallax technique may provide a better prediction of the true thickness.

At identical reading points thickness was also assessed with an A-mode device (5 replicates) and by needle probing for determination of true thickness.