The phrase "a true premise" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions about logic, arguments, or reasoning, where the truth of a premise is being evaluated.
Example: "In order to construct a valid argument, it is essential to start with a true premise."
Alternatives: "a valid premise" or "an accurate premise".
For example, 'Pat is asleep' can be used at one time to express a true premise, and at another time to express a false premise.
The problem was dealt with by the provision of extra premises which ensured that the very same things referred to by a true premise are the things referred to by the demonstrative phrases in the conclusion.
If 'this' does not succeed in pointing to a living man, then "Every man is running, therefore this man is running" may have a true premise and a false conclusion.
If a truth is the consequence of several truths, they constitute its total ground while each true premise is a partial ground.
As successful arguers have always known, this means that the construction of a successful argument requires, not only a search for true premises, but an understanding of the members of one's audience (their beliefs, attitudes and values) and the premises that will consequently 'speak' to them.
But to understand the true premise of "Kai Po Che," audiences may want to note what Mr. Bhagat changed or omitted from his novel as he wrote the screenplay with the director.
I got so swept up in the Rudy case that I almost forgot what the true premise of this show was until the halfway point, when Nick was suddenly being tailed.
(For a summary of theories of what it means to be true in a story, see Woods 2006). is true and follows by free existential generalization from 'SThe Lord of the Rings(Gollum hates the sun)' together with the true premise 'E the sun'.
(1968, p. 90) Since the conclusion contradicts the truism, we are left with a paradox: seemingly true premises have led to a seemingly false conclusion.
A valid conclusion is a true statement that is deduced from a set of true premises by using the laws of reasoning.
This is very much in the spirit of modern logical theory: all that it takes to show that a certain form is invalid is a single instance of that form with true premises and a false conclusion.
