The phrase "a trial length" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the duration of a trial period, often in contexts like product testing, research studies, or legal proceedings.
Example: "The company decided to implement a trial length of three months to evaluate the new software's effectiveness."
Alternatives: "trial period" or "testing duration".
With a trial length of 8 seconds and total of 300 trials, the experimental session lasted 40 minutes.
Each sentence had a duration of about 5 s followed by an ISI of 11 s, resulting in a trial length of 16 s an adequate time window to model the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response.
However, the reported remission rates are in line with the findings of the study of Kamm et al. [ 9], although other clinical endpoints were set and a six-week-period was chosen as a trial length.
Visual stimuli were the same as in the TMS experiment, but stimulus presentation was divided into separate trials (8 cycles of apparent motion [160 frames], with the target displayed in cycles 3 6 [randomized], resulting in a trial duration of 2.13 s length).
In each trial, a stimulus was presented for 1040 ms, followed by an inter-stimulus interval of 1060 ms, resulting in a total trial length [also known as stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA)] of 2100 ms. An event-related design was used, with a pseudo-randomized trial in order to increase contrast detection efficiency (Liu 2004).
Trial structure (Figure 1) was as follows: cue (750 ms), inter-stimulus-interval (ISI; 3250 ms), probe (2500 ms), and minimum inter-trial-interval (ITI) of 1000 ms (for a minimum total trial length of 7.5 seconds).
A repeated measures ANOVA showed a significant effect of trial length (five, six, or seven) on accuracy, F 2, 30) = 7.431, MSE = 15.915, p =.002.
In iterative learning control the same finite duration operation, known as a trial over the trial length, is performed over and over again with resetting to the starting location once each is complete, or a stoppage at the end of the current trial before the next one begins.
This analysis was conducted a) for the whole trial length of 700 ms, and b) for subsequent intervals of 40 ms from 0 to 640 ms post stimulus onset. Figure 2 shows the grand averages obtained from the entire group of twenty subjects (variability in the experimental data is illustrated in Figure S1).
One could also think of incorporating learning effects into a model, reasoning that learning leads to an overestimation of costs and an underestimation of effectiveness during the trial period and that these deviations from steady state cost-effectiveness outcomes can be modeled as a function of clinical trial length.
If a rat did not consume the chocolate, a latency equal to the maximum trial length was recorded.
