Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Therefore, the EST-SSRs developed from A. konjac and A. bulbifer could be successfully applied to other Amorphophallus species, with a transferability rate of 86.9%.
Similar(59)
In this study, the Amorphophallus species had a high transferability rate (86.9%).
Similarly, Gimenes and colleagues [ 34] also observed a cross transferability rate of 60 to 100% to species belonging to different sections of Arachis using Arachis hypogaea microsatellites.
The investigation showed that SNPs identified within the 'Golden Delicious' sequence had an average transferability rate of 40.9% to Malus cultivars, with the lowest TSNP to the cultivar 'Wagner' (25.7%) from those tested.
However, 51 UGMS primers gave reproducible amplification at least in a single related species (C. lutescens; 63.4%, C. irrawadiensis; 34.4%, C. japonica; red; 59% and white flower; 57.4%) and recorded an overall 83.6% cross transferability rate.
The least transferability rate was observed in case of section Triseminatae a basally diverged species [ 3, 4].
The cross species transferability of genomic SSR markers was comparatively higher among the species of Eucalyptus and the transferability rate dropped down in the species of Corymbia and Angophora (Steane et al. [2001]).
The transferability rate was 70.8% for associations originally reported as genome-wide significant and 38.0% for associations originally reported as suggestive.
However, when we comprehensively evaluated all HapMap variants in linkage disequilibrium (r2≥0.3) with the reported variants, the transferability rate increased to 54.1%.
The transferability rate was 70.8% for the 77 variants that originally showed strong associations p-values≤5×10−7 p-values≤5×10−7 the 75 vandants that originally showed suggestive associations (p-values ranging from 4.5×10−38.0 5×10−7; Supplementary Table S1).
The microsatellite primer pairs of A. hypogaea showed high transferability rate to other species of the genus.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com