Sentence examples for a total evidence from inspiring English sources

A Quartet Decomposition supertree [46], [71], [72] and a total evidence approach [55] were used.

The data sets were combined in a super-matrix to estimate a total evidence tree.

We conducted a "total evidence" analysis combining nuclear (ncpGS, ITS) and plastid (trnL-trnF, trnK-matK, trnS-trnG, rbcL) DNA sequences and using MP and BI to test the hypothesis of radiation as suggested by previous phylogenetic results.

While a ML homogeneity test rejected congruency of sequences from the three target loci (p<0.003 for all topologies), sequence data were concatenated in accordance with a total evidence approach [24].

In this study, we invoked a "total evidence" approach [93], [94] (also called "simultaneous analysis" [95]) in phylogenetic analysis to combine both sequence and structure data of the complete (571 tRNAs) and partitioned matrices.

Even a total evidence supermatrix/supertree approach, which included all molecular markers commonly used in palm systematics (13 in total), plus both morphological and RFLP datasets, did not help resolve the exact position of Cocos within the Attaleinae [19], placing the genus as sister to Parajubaea in a clade with only 52% BP.

As we were mostly interested in reconstructing the phylogenetic tree of species, we also analysed the different data sets in a total-evidence approach [26].

To test whether the different partitions trace the same evolutionary history (or at least trace statistically indistinguishable histories) and can therefore fruitfully be combined in a total-evidence approach [26], we applied the Incongruence Length Difference test (ILD, [47], [48]) to the MP analysis using heuristic search.

The Incongruence Length Difference (ILD) test indicated no significant difference between the chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal ITS data (P > 0.05) and therefore the two datasets were combined to give a total-evidence phylogeny.

Intron-containing low-copy sequence markers, long-favored for Sanger sequencing (Folk and Freudenstein, 2014, and citations therein), will be increasingly important in genera and species complexes for a robust sampling not only for a total-evidence phylogeny, but more critically for individual gene histories.

Inclusion of differing character information in a concatenated approach is still preferred as a more accurate approximation to the true species phylogeny, as evidenced by the retrieval of a single, total evidence tree with high support values even though large amounts of significantly conflicting data (data not shown) are present in the combined dataset.