The phrase "a threshold that was" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific point or limit that existed in the past.
Example: "The researchers identified a threshold that was crucial for understanding the species' migration patterns."
Alternatives: "a limit that existed" or "a boundary that was".
And he thinks that it was precisely such a threshold that was crossed with the invention of the scientific method.
It was not until this decade that more than half of the public said they supported legalization, a threshold that was reached thanks to a leap in support between 2010 and 2013.
They alleged that Jameson Hospital in New Castle, Pa., had used a threshold that was significantly lower than what the federal government requires for workplace drug testing and also had failed to ask the woman whether she had eaten anything that might have affected the test results.
We extracted fits exceeding a threshold that was specific for each transcription factor.
Spikes were detected using a threshold that was manually adjusted for each recording.
This allowed us to determine a threshold that was used to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the odds ratio for each PK parameter.
Three different segmentation methods are considered: thresholding using a fixed threshold relative to the maximum, a threshold that is automatically determined from the image information [20, 29], and deformable surfaces based on Fourier descriptors [22, 23, 28, 30].
Any revisions to Senate rules usually require 67 votes, a threshold that is impossible to obtain without significant Republican support.
But this means that more sensitive methods will have a threshold that is too low (and vice versa) and the risks of a wrongful designation are correspondingly greater.
Part-time workers are eligible, though they must earn enough each year to pay Social Security taxes, a threshold that is now about $1,200.
Drunken driving is a major issue that demands attention, but targeting drivers at 0.05 blood alcohol content, a threshold that is less impairing than talking on a hands-free cellphone, is not the solution.
