Furthermore, studies refer to and confirm a target interval for post filter iCa of 0.25 0.35 mmol/L without disclosing the method used for the respective iCa measurement [ 12, 13].
In order to reflect different preferences of different decision makers, in this section we first introduce the concept of the preference level that the interval objective function is preferred to a target interval in light of preference-based index in [28].
The systemic iCa concentration interval is targeted to physiological concentrations (1.12 1.20 mmol/L) whereas the post filter iCa concentration is extremely low with a recommended target interval of 0.25 0.34 mmol/L [ 7, 8].
In the training period, a target interval (two stimuli separated by an interval of a particular duration) was presented at the beginning of the trial.
Taking into account different preferences of different decision makers, the preference level that the interval objective function is preferred to a target interval is defined in terms of preference-based index developed by Ruan et al. [28].
Each trial consisted of two intervals, a target interval (containing agent B) and a nontarget interval (not containing agent B), with a 500 ms fixation cross (black against a grey background) in between.
There was only one of the six devices with a median value within the target interval of the recommendation scheme (0.24 0.35 mmol/L) [ 7, 8].
In addition, molecular marker screening determined the genotypic state of the phenotyped plants in the target interval of 0.3 cM between the previously mapped microsatellite markers ORS509 and HT446 on LG1.
Behavioral data showed that at an inter-target interval of 232 ms, the report for emotionally arousing (pleasant and unpleasant) words was more accurate than for neutral control words.
