The phrase "a systemic change" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a significant transformation that affects an entire system or structure, often in contexts like social, economic, or organizational change.
Example: "The organization is advocating for a systemic change to improve the overall efficiency and effectiveness of its operations."
Alternatives: "a fundamental shift" or "an overarching transformation".
Small farmers, artisans, restaurateurs, demanding shopkeepers, activists, media professional and, last but not least, conscientious consumers with enough financial and cultural capital establish sustainable ways of producing, distributing, and eating based on the conviction that personal choices will eventually send a message to the food system, generating a systemic change.
In contrast, the ecological resilience definition considers a systemic change: when complex systems (including humans) respond to disturbances by reorganizing into a new regime (stable state) where structural and functional aspects have fundamentally changed relative to the prior regime.
Second, we analyze if these effects depend on whether or not an economy has already implemented a systemic change from a DB to a DC system.
"In my view this is a systemic change, not just good public relations".
And that's going to need to be a systemic change over years, not months".
With such a systemic change, it is natural that supporting measures will be insufficient.
Stop thinking about equal compensation as the result of a systemic changes, and start thinking of it as the reason change happens.
It's going to take a variety of approaches to create a profound systemic change.
Politically speaking, the reason is obvious: even advocates such as Cooper describe the transformation of a consumer economy fuelled by obsolescence as a "radical, systemic change" that is likely, at least in the short term, to slow economic growth.
The groundswell of supervisors seeking to address a more systemic change for all startups since TechCrunch's original article is a good indication that multiple forces in the city government want to keep startups happy.
"We need a fundamental, systemic change, and the union won't talk about it.
