The phrase "a surrender in which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a specific type of surrender that involves certain conditions or circumstances.
Example: "The treaty outlined a surrender in which both parties agreed to cease hostilities and negotiate terms for peace."
Alternatives: "a capitulation that involves" or "a yielding in which".
And second, it seems to me that this economic package includes other conditions that cut gravely into the development of our democracy and the sovereignty of this country". Added his party colleague Everardo Martinez Sanchez: "This contract seems a contract of surrender, in which the conqueror imposes all the conditions on the conquered.
Years of controversy regarding the distribution of families between this order and the Cryptonemiales resulted in a surrender tactic in which Kraft and Robins [ 75] simply merged the two orders considering this the best step forward for a total re-evaluation of this complex.
Finally, he sent Hull a letter demanding his surrender, in which he stated, in part, "It is far from my inclination to join in a war of extermination, but you must be aware that the numerous body of Indians who have attached themselves to my troops will be beyond my control the moment the contest commences".
I had what I can only describe as an epiphany, a moment of lucid and complete surrender, in which the whole of Mexico seemed to come up inside me and I felt that this was a moment that would never end and that wherever I went I would not leave this place.' Navigation without a map is difficult in Latin America, Thomson points out, because it's considered rude not to give directions.
The report cited Emil Puhl, the Vice President of the Reichsbank, the Nazi German central bank, who was also quoted in a separate document relating to negotiations with Swiss officials in March 1945, less than two months before Germany's surrender, in which he persuaded the Swiss officials to loosen a freeze on German accounts imposed six weeks earlier under United States pressure.
In victory, the indigenous forces, unpolished but seasoned by a generation of upheaval, acted in ways unfamiliar to the American commanders: first mounting cavalry charges into the teeth of tanks, then negotiating terms of surrender in which some went home with their firearms and others entered prison only to rebel in a suicidal last stand.
To read: Paul Krugman's Op-Ed column, headlined "The President Surrenders," in which he calls the deal to end the debt crisis a "disaster" that "will damage an already depressed economy" and "take America a long way down the road to banana-republic status".
Historically, unconditional surrenders -- in which the vanquished state is so defeated that it has ceased to be an independent political entity -- happen only rarely.
If so, constitutional guaranties, so carefully safeguarded against direct assault, are open to destruction by the indirect, but no less effective, process of requiring a surrender, which, though in form voluntary, in fact lacks none of the elements of compulsion.
If so, constitutional guaranties, so carefully safeguarded against direct assault, are open to destruction by the indirect but no less effective process of requiring a surrender which, though in form voluntary, in fact lacks none of the elements of compulsion.
