Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
As a summary, Tables 1 to 3 show coverage rates for each of the three methods of analysis for each sample size combination when averaged over the 15 parameter/distribution combinations for a given control group ICC – that is, three distributional assumptions for each of five ICC combinations.
Similar(59)
A summary (Table 1) and details (Tables S1, S2, S3 and S4, additional file 2) of BNC and resuscitation health system bottlenecks and proposed solutions are presented.
A classification of the CONTSID toolbox methods is then possible and is given by a summary table.
Further, at the end of each category, a summary table is available, making the overall analysis easier.
Gene alignments for homeolog-specific PCR validation, along with a summary table are available at https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.org/10.5061/dryad
A summary table is presented showing the most frequently used percentile values (5th, 10th and 15th percentiles) of the MET corresponding to a range of %MVC values.
We ran rMATS for all pairs of six developmental stages (E15, E18, P0, P3, P6 and P9) and generated a summary table with the number of different alternative splicing events that were detected below 1% FDR threshold (Table 3).
The richness of the joint distribution of intensities across imaging methods can be best assessed within the context of a particular analysis approach as opposed to a summary table.
(Click here to see a summary table of results).
A summary table of the benefits and drawbacks to VFGs can be found in Table 1.
A summary table of solution space reduction is given in Additional file 3: Table S1.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com