The phrase "a suitable comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the appropriateness of comparing two or more items, ideas, or concepts.
Example: "In order to illustrate the differences between the two theories, I believe that a suitable comparison would be to examine their foundational principles."
Alternatives: "an appropriate analogy" or "a fitting comparison".
A suitable comparison for Home is The Croods, which debuted with £5.37m including previews of £1.85m in March 2013.
But some experts said today that it was not a suitable comparison because the anthrax spores released at Sverdlovsk may not have been as finely processed, or "militarized," as spores sent through the United States mail.
"It was a parlor game all year trying to think of a parallel space," he said, but neither Mr. Wasley nor his visitors could come up with a suitable comparison.
Furthermore, some group which has been taught in a traditional manner and can be used for a suitable comparison would also be needed.
For all the cases, the optimum mass flow rate (0.20 kg/s) is selected to be used in order for a suitable comparison to be presented.
Moreover, the conventional working fluid LiBr-H2O is examined under the same operating conditions in order to perform a suitable comparison.
The Dark Knight Rises – a less suitable comparison – debuted here with £14.36m in July 2012.
A more suitable comparison point, however, illustrates why the 46-year-old Smith's star lustre may be fading.
These figures can be used to provide a more suitable comparison of local performance, as they take into account the distribution of sociodemographic factors that we know affect breastfeeding.
For instance, the National Joint Registry's eighth annual report found that observed mortality after joint replacement was lower than that among the comparable wider population. 2 Therefore, a more suitable comparison group is patients with other types of hip replacement.
Leonard et al. (2008) found a deficit of diabetes mortality in comparing exposed DuPont workers with the U.S. population but a 2-fold increase in diabetes mortality compared with other, nonexposed DuPont workers (SMR = 1.97; 95% CI, 1.23 2.98; 22 deaths), arguably a more suitable comparison group because of the healthy worker effect.
