The phrase "a suit to proceed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal contexts when referring to a formal action taken in court to continue with a case or legal matter.
Example: "The attorney filed a suit to proceed with the case after the initial hearing was postponed."
Alternatives: "a motion to proceed" or "a petition to continue".
The Supreme Court smoothed his path, by allowing a civil suit to proceed against a president while in office.
In a significant loss, a federal judge said what the company was doing might be more akin to tapping a phone and allowed the suit to proceed.
But after initially ruling in favour of the defendant's motion to strike Woods's case on 2 February, the judge has now allowed the suit to proceed in a move described by the Hollywood Reporter as a "stunning reversal".
The long, complex ruling dismissed claims against only two defendants -- Deutsche Bank and Kirkland & Ellis, the Chicago law firm -- while allowing the suit to proceed against almost a dozen other institutions and firms, including Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch and Vinson & Elkins.
The decision only dismissed claims against two defendants -- Deutsche Bank and Kirkland & Ellis, the Chicago law firm -- while allowing the suit to proceed against almost a dozen other institutions and firms, including Citigroup, J. P. Morgan Chase, Merrill Lynch and Vinson & Elkins.
Justice Stephen G. Breyer suggested that it would be an odd legal system that would require a lawsuit against a foreign government to be dismissed but allow the same suit to proceed once the plaintiff listed the names of the officials involved.
The senior officials under former President George W. Bush, also including former FBI Director Robert Mueller and Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner James Ziglar, have asked the justices to reverse a 2015 lower court ruling allowing the long-running suit to proceed.
The appeals court in the case, Mount Holly v. Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, No. 11-1507, ruled that proof of disparate impact without evidence of an intent to discriminate was enough to allow the suit to proceed.
You must include facts concerning the case and a legally recognizable cause of action in order for the suit to proceed.
But the judge allowed the suit to proceed in March of this year, ruling that it is a navigation channel, not a flood control project.
