Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a substantive error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to a significant or meaningful mistake in a document, argument, or analysis.
Example: "The report was rejected due to a substantive error in the data analysis that affected the overall conclusions."
Alternatives: "a significant mistake" or "a major error".
Exact(3)
Rather, the question is whether the omission is indicative of a substantive error by the tribunal.
(3) A substantive error is an error that impacts the quantity of GHG emissions reported or otherwise prevents the reported data from being validated or verified.
The order signed by Judge Paul G. Gardephe of the Federal District Court in Manhattan says the two sides "agree that there was a substantive error in the judgment" and that they "voluntarily have resolved all issues between them".
Similar(57)
"If somebody comes to us and says that, in our review, there has been a factual and substantive error, we'll go back and take a look at that".
The revised report must correct all substantive errors.
Traditional journalism certainly punishes trivial errors--trivial in the sense of errors in basic facts--but it formulates news in a way that hedges against the problem of substantive error, the product of a variety of causes such as the omission of key contextual information, or the exaggeration or misinterpretation of data.
Such notification will identify each such substantive error.
The Court compounds its substantive error today by the procedural ploy of switching the burden of proof to the prosecution.
A27 BUSINESS DAY C1-22 Microsoftoldtitrust appeal Microsofederal appealsal appeals court that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson had committed a host of procedural and substantive errors and that his antitrust finding and remedies should be overruled.
In its opening brief with the Court of Appeals, the company accused Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson of committing a host of procedural and substantive errors.
Microsoft has countered that Judge Jackson committed a raft of procedural and substantive errors and that he was biased against it.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com