The phrase "a substantial violation of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal, formal, or academic contexts to describe a significant breach of rules, laws, or agreements.
Example: "The company faced severe penalties due to a substantial violation of environmental regulations."
Alternatives: "a serious breach of" or "a significant infringement of".
Between those two cases, however, are a wide range of differences on what type of alteration constitutes a substantial violation of the lease and what doesn't.
Many alterations, even those that may constitute a substantial violation of the no-alteration clause, can ultimately be cured by the tenant.
For example, Ms. McGuire said, in a 1997 Manhattan case, an appeals court ruled that a tenant who had replaced all kitchen and bathroom appliances had committed a substantial violation of the lease and could be evicted.
The Secretary of Transportation shall conduct a timely investigation of a nonfrivolous written complaint alleging that a substantial violation of a regulation prescribed under this subchapter is occurring or has occurred within the prior 60 days.
A Peter Schwartz, a Manhattan landlord-tenant lawyer, said that even though the lease provides that the apartment may be used for residential purposes only, it is unlikely that a court would consider the use of the apartment as a home office as a substantial violation of the lease.
For example, although federal law does prohibit reprisals against contractor employees who speak up about misconduct, the information disclosed must "relate to a substantial violation of law related to a contract".
From the evidence that has been made public, "there appeared to be a prima facie case of a conspiracy to violate, and substantial violation of the revolving door statute," said Stanley Brand, a Washington lawyer who specializes in defending clients investigated by the government.
Indeed, the Constitution and federal statutes have already "federalized" numerous matters relating to the appointment of presidential electors, including those at issue here.... Contrary to the F.D.P.'s assertions, this case involves much more than a "state law dispute," and instead involves substantial violations of due process and Title 3, United States Code, Section 5.
We must model a world where people display multiple and substantial violations of the rationality assumptions of microeconomic theoryIn my view, economists have failed to take enough account of the impact of financial markets, perhaps because, until the 1980s, these markets seemed relatively unimportant.
