Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a substantial variance of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing significant differences or changes in data, measurements, or conditions.
Example: "The study revealed a substantial variance of results between the two groups, indicating a need for further investigation."
Alternatives: "a significant difference in" or "a considerable deviation from".
Exact(1)
There is a substantial variance of the Te estimates (348 – 902 Mya) because of the major branch length differences and the small number of RGC_CAMs on some branches (e.g., 3 RGC_CAMs on the mouse branch compared to 1 RGC_CAM on the human branch) which leads to over-dispersion.
Similar(59)
There was a substantial variance in the number of clones which was not explained by age.
A substantial natural variance of the PEWY residues was revealed and phylum-specific patterns were identified.
In multi-level models that considered center as a level of analysis, substantial variance was accounted for by centers, pointing to the importance of considering center-level predictors in future research.
Our finding that cerebral volume accounts for substantial variance in a variety of measures is fully consistent with this view.
Pre-test variation accounted for a substantial amount of variance in transition ratings in addition to the post-test scores, indicating a low level of present-state bias.
Finally, although the models in the current study explained a substantial amount of variance in parents' intentions, a large proportion of variance in the target behaviours remains unexplained.
Established prenatal and birth-related variables explain a substantial amount of variance in PTSD symptoms, but the amount of explained variance can be substantially increased from 43% to a total amount of 68% when theoretically-derived cognitive variables are additionally taken into account.
Yet, while personal experience with extreme weather seems to explain very little to no variance in negative affect (R = 0.006), negative affect explains a substantial amount of variance in risk perceptions of climate change (R = 0.29).
A substantial amount of variance (26%) in infecting parasite communities was explained by variation among collection sites.
Genetic factors explained a substantial proportion of variance in EC (58%) and the outcome variables of optimism (55%), general self-esteem (45%), happiness (48%), and self-derogation (29%).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com