The phrase "a substantial strength of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the significant power or influence of something, often in a context related to arguments, resources, or characteristics.
Example: "The research presented a substantial strength of evidence supporting the new theory."
Alternatives: "a significant amount of strength" or "a considerable degree of strength."
Some studies have attempted to provide a scale and would describe κ=0.70 as "substantial" strength of agreement [37],[38], but despite considerable debate among statisticians this issue has never been definitively addressed.
For WHO clinical stage, unweighted analysis resulted in a Kappa statistic of 0.54 (± 0.04), while weighted analysis showed a Kappa of 0.65 (± 0.06), classified as "substantial" strength of agreement (30).
A substantial redistribution of the electronic wavefunctions of the CrO4 2− anion and the adsorbent indicates substantial strength of this interaction.
Due to the substantial strength of C C bond (with average bond energy over 2 eV), the relative orientations of neighboring C C bonds (i.e., bond angles) in a nanocoil would alter during compression or elongation in order to avoid significant changes of C C bond lengths.
However, as pointed out by Rauch et al. [ 2], chronological age may be a poor variable to account for muscle strength because physical development, hence body size, is a substantial determinant of strength.
Citric acid levels were raised to 50, 60, 70 gpl as the concentrations of 40 and 80 gpl developed DP rating of 3 and substantial strength loss due to partial degradation of fabric with appearance of yellowness respectively.
On the other hand, pain relief is also very important in orthopedics and it may be more substantial in achieving quick rehabilitation than real strength of bone, as it may facilitate earlier mobilization, while supporting material can be used for movement during the first post-operative days.
Type I GFRP bars, with the lower moisture uptake, exhibited insignificant strength reductions in the range of 2 15% whereas Type II, with the higher moisture uptake, exhibited substantial strength reductions in the range of 19 50%.
