The phrase "a substantial harm" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing significant negative impacts or damages in various contexts, such as legal, environmental, or health-related discussions.
Example: "The new policy could lead to a substantial harm to the local ecosystem if not carefully managed."
Alternatives: "a significant damage" or "a considerable injury."
Officials were quick to deny any substantial harm to the monarchs.
Jurors also found that DuPont acted with a "conscious disregard" for the rights and safety of others in a way "that has a great probability of causing substantial harm," which, along with a finding of compensatory damages, granted Freeman punitive damages under Ohio State Law.
This, of course, doesn't change the fact that to be hired, they must have the necessary credentials and be able with a reasonable accommodation if it's needed to carry out the essential functions of a job without posing a "significant risk of substantial harm" to themselves or others.
Under its regulations, the F.D.A. can order a recall only if there is an "unreasonable risk of substantial harm to the public health".
The commission's regulation in turn interprets the phrase "direct threat" to mean "a significant risk of substantial harm to the health or safety of the individual or others that cannot be eliminated or reduced by reasonable accommodation".
The state will only interfere with parental choices where there is a significant risk of substantial harm to the child (Diekema 2004).
another party will suffer substantial harm as a result of a stay.
In a bid to prevent trivial actions, any statement must also have caused "substantial harm" for a libel action to be brought under the new plans.
On March 26th, the vice-president of campus life told W.P. in a letter that his enrollment would pose an "unacceptably high risk of substantial harm to your health and safety that cannot be mitigated by any reasonable modifications".
A foreign office spokesman put forward a pedestrian justification of the government's stance based on being able to "fully consider the large volume of relevant material already identified that cannot be disclosed openly without a real risk of causing substantial harm or real damage to the public interest".
