Sentence examples for a subsequently published trial from inspiring English sources

A subsequently published trial of 2-4 year old children [ 20] examined the effect of 22,600 ppm varnish applied twice a year over 2 years and reported a 57% reduction in caries increment compared to a control group.

Reasons for exclusion were: no data on treatment effect (251), reviews (29), no randomised controlled trials (37), data of a subsequently published trial (7), physical therapy after neoplastic conditions or systemic diseases (2), no TMD pathology (4), no PT as previously defined (5), irrelevant outcome variables (2), and therapy on painless TMD symptoms (1).

A summary article of reviews and a systematic review of subsequently published trials reported that certain extensively hydrolyzed casein formulas and certain partially hydrolyzed whey formulas are capable of reducing the risk of allergy in high-risk infants [ 60].

It is plausible that in some of the subsequently published trials the review had an influence on the choice of the comparator against which a new, potentially innovative, experimental intervention was tested.

Thirdly, the proportion of subsequently published trials that could have had an impact on clinical practice has remained low.

16 However, the authors of less than one third of subsequently published trials chose the primary reference treatment as a comparator.

In our study, about 1 in 3 subsequently published trials only used the primary reference treatment as a comparator.

We also checked whether subsequently published trials cited the Picard review, and whether the designs of trials that cited the review differed from those that did not.

Specifically, we checked whether the number of new trials on the subject published per year had decreased over time, and whether the Picard review had influenced the design of subsequently published trials.

A subsequently published comment referred to this as a long-standing practice [ 11].

Papers presenting only follow-up data or longer-term outcomes of a previously published trial were subsequently excluded as details of the intervention may previously have been reported.