The phrase "a study was accomplished" is grammatically correct but may not be the most natural expression in written English.
It can be used when discussing the completion of a research project or academic work, although "conducted" or "completed" might be more common.
Example: "After months of research and analysis, a study was accomplished that provided valuable insights into the subject."
Alternatives: "a study was conducted" or "a study was completed."
Since, the paper concerns climatic cyclic conditions, a study is accomplished on investigating different material properties (thermal conductivity, diffusivity, solubility) for moisture control inside an enclosure.
In this research, a field study was accomplished on the implementation of the storage tanks in a refinery site and then, the resulted imperfections were identified and categorized.
A Delphi study was accomplished on the topic "what is needed to implement the information society within healthcare? and which research topics should be given higher priority than other topics to achieve the desired evolution?", involving 29 international experts.
To find out the extent of fluoride contamination in drinking water and to find out the fluoride exposure dose in the study area (Mandvi Taluka, Surat), an extensive study was accomplished by estimating fluoride level in drinking water with respect to BIS and WHO standards.
After extraction process, a re-extraction study was accomplished and the obtained results showed that chromium could be removed from the microemulsion phase by hydrochloric and sulphuric acidic solutions, what allows its reuse in the leather manufacturing process.
Meanwhile, Hela cancer cell lines were cultivated in solution and a growth kinetic study was accomplished.
The calculation of traction stresses in this study was accomplished by generating a finite element mesh surrounding a cell in a hydrogel using confocal images.
The valuation exercise in both the pilot and main study was accomplished through self-completion of a paper-based TTO questionnaire in a moderated group session, based on the MVH protocol modelling of valuation tariffs [ 17] (see Additional file 2).
While reviewing each study, the same two reviewers used standardized forms to independently extract and record four aspects: study id, list of critical adoption factors, country where the study was accomplished, type of practice, study setting, a knowledge-based classification in which critical adoption factors might engage type of electronic health records use, and study type.
An experimental study was accomplished with 3 RBC bags (CPDA-1 preservative) from different donors with storage time ranging from 12 to 31 days.
This study was accomplished by combining BrdU immunohistochemistry and MCH in situ hybridization or Hcrt immunohistochemistry.
