The phrase "a study that criticized" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a research study that has expressed disapproval or negative feedback about a particular subject or issue.
Example: "The study that criticized the methodology used in previous research has sparked a debate among scholars."
Alternatives: "a study that challenged" or "a study that condemned".
Mr. Richwine was also the co-author of a Heritage Foundation study that criticized legislation in the Senate to overhaul the nation's immigration laws, citing high economic costs.
Sleep apnea (SA) was associated with increased prevalence of aortic dissection (AD) in studies that were criticized for either their small sample size or lack of prospective observation.
Another study that Dr. Sloan criticized looked at patients in a cardiac care unit to determine whether they fared better if a small group of born-again Christians prayed on their behalf.
The reading debate today contains echoes from two years ago, when the National Early Literacy Panel published a report that was criticized by some for taking too narrow a view of scientific studies.
He was criticized for an ATSDR study that underplayed the risks of formaldehyde in federal trailers used by Hurricane Katrina refugees.
That study harshly criticized the Bush Administration for letting Earth science projects play second fiddle to space science.
Although the methods of that study were criticized, findings were later replicated in other studies in Sweden [ 13].
On the one hand, study results were criticized: that is, it was suggested that the original study results lacked generalizability, at least in part because of the fact that it was a single-center study, and because patients frequently received parenteral calories, which was not common practice.
In a narrative review about studies on the reliability of peer review, Cicchetti [5] stated that information about the rating system is very basic for an empirical research paper and criticized studies that did not provide this information.
In addition to being dramatically under-powered, that study has been criticized for a number of other methodological/design failings [ 8, 9].
