Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a study of human" is not correct as it is incomplete.
It should be "a study of humans" or "a study of human behavior" to be grammatically correct. You can use it when referring to research or analysis focused on human beings or aspects of humanity, but it needs to be completed for clarity.
Example: "The researchers conducted a study of human behavior in social settings."
Alternatives: "an analysis of humans" or "a research on human nature."
Exact(58)
It really is, just as a study of human nature".
And yet, and yet… As a study of human behaviour or a comedy of manners, it touches genius.
Economics — which is at root a study of human behavior — tends to be messier.
Jacques Tati, 1953 You say: Its mock-silent method is wonderfully suited to a study of human incompetence without being patronising; it's peerless.
For more than twenty years, Robert Sampson, a Harvard sociologist, and a team of researchers have conducted a study of human development in Chicago neighborhoods.
The religious claim, of course, is that God does exist and that theology is not simply a study of human belief but an investigation of reality.
Yet the page from Leonardo da Vinci's Codex Arundel notebook in the Treasures gallery of the British Library is not – or not directly – a study of human anatomy.
The French architect Le Corbusier developed a theory of proportion called Modulor, also based on a study of human proportions.
During the nineteen-eighties and nineties, Wim H. M. Saris, a professor of nutrition at the University of Maastricht, conducted a study of human endurance by following participants in the Tour.
According to a study of human remains from China and Japan, the height of the average person declined by more than three inches during the millennia in which rice cultivation intensified.
Like Gone Home, it's a study of human relationships and pressures – and as the investigator you're going to gain a certain perspective based on the AR artefacts you discover.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com