The phrase "a study item" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific topic or object that is being examined or analyzed in a study or research context.
Example: "The researchers identified a study item that required further investigation to understand its implications on the overall findings."
Alternatives: "a research topic" or "an examination subject".
The number of adjacent subcarriers in each PRB was a study item in 3GPP by the time we started our simulation work.
Relays as part of infrastructure based networks are currently standardised in the Technical Specification Group j (TSG j) of IEEE802.16 [2] and it is currently a study item in 3 GPP [3].
In compliance of this, the 3GPP technical sub-group, responsible for conformance testing, is currently discussing the terms of reference and a study item, as part of the 3GPP Release 11 specification about UE application layer data throughput performance, was recently agreed in a 3GPP RAN plenary meeting [20].
Study trials consisted of a 3000 msec white fixation cross, followed by a study item that appeared for 5000 msecs with a white frame.
Further, a study item was allowed to be a lure only once in each block.
Raters found it difficult to agree about the spectrum of patients included in a study (Item 1) and the correct application and interpretation of the test (Item 10).
Heterogeneous network (Het-Net) is part of the long-term evolution advanced (LTE-A) study item and represents cellular deployments with a mixture of cells of different overlapping coverage areas, e.g., a number of relay and pico cells overlaid by a macro cell in the same frequency.
Increased activation in the right prefrontal cortex is observed when a cue successfully retrieves a studied item [ 12, 14- 16].
Therefore, 3GPP started a new study item: LTE-A in March 2008 which was confirmed as an IMT-A technology in November 2010 [2].
In LTE Rel-11, mobility enhancements in HetNets have been investigated through a dedicated study item [2].
Improvement in the cognitive training task was assessed by the maximum lag interval between initial presentation of a new study item and its subsequent reappearance in the test list with the maximum possible lag interval of 52 intervening items.
