The phrase "a strong implication of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that suggests or indicates a particular conclusion or meaning strongly.
Example: "The study presents a strong implication of a link between diet and mental health."
Alternatives: "a clear suggestion of" or "a significant indication of".
After all, "denounce" and "reject" both carry a strong implication of condemnation.
Whether to describe waterfront areas with mangroves as mangrove forests, with a strong implication of the need for forest conservation, or as mangrove swamps, with a strong implication of the need to eradicate and clean up such areas, can influence public opinion.
Thus a strong implication of our data is that it should be possible to create metamers for speech content.
Taken together, our observations suggest a strong implication of ZNF703 in the transcriptional control of cell cycle progression.
A strong implication of cause was often made for a mother who had more than one affected child, particularly where no previous generations were known to be affected.
[which is a strong implication of low self-esteem] (laughed) The doctor said, "It is lucky that you did not die of that.
The fragmentation of the metal barrier layer into bulges has a strong implication on the nature of lateral flow.
Overall, these data led to the hypothesis of a strong implication for GI peptides in the occurrence of intestinal barrier dysfunction during the administration of chemotherapeutic regimens to breast cancer patients.
The instantaneous peak water demand was estimated to range between 16 and 93 l/min within the monitored homes, which has a strong implication for the design of household water supply system.
Even though our data do not show that Foxp3 determines cytokine dependence directly, we feel that there is a strong implication that the presence of Foxp3 inversely correlates with cytokine production in Treg cells, based on the fact that Foxp3 expression is restricted to Treg cells in mice.
A spokesman said that the charity "utterly refutes the strong implication of the judge's comments that a child's behaviour can somehow mitigate that of an adult who perpetrates sexual violence against her".
