The phrase "a strong competitive position" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing a company's market standing or advantage over its competitors.
Example: "The company has established a strong competitive position in the tech industry, allowing it to dominate market share."
Alternatives: "a robust market stance" or "a solid competitive edge."
He said the company had good relationships with computer makers, and, while it wouldn't seek to harm those relationships, "if they have a strong competitive position, it is incumbent on them to use it".
His generally savvy stewardship has left giant JPMorgan in a strong competitive position, earning him McDonald's praise as a "hero," a "financial philosopher" and a "moral and managerial compass for both his industry and the country itself".
But Ms. Fiorina says the company is winning more sales against Sun than in the past, and is moving into a strong competitive position with the release later this year of the IA 64 chip, or Itanium, jointly developed by Hewlett-Packard and the Intel Corporation.
Maintain a strong competitive position C.
The new services offered enhance attractivity and impose a strong competitive position.
But the company has a strong competitive position, and a new management team is doing a good job cutting costs.
The company said it had received up to $125 million in debtor-in-possession financing and expects to emerge from bankruptcy in the third quarter with reduced debts and a stronger competitive position.
On a tactical level his affirmations of faith should help put the Democrats in a stronger competitive position with religious voters, but Mr. Gore and Mr. Lieberman must be careful not to let their campaign take on a theocratic tone reminiscent of the Republican alliance with the religious right.
We expect Intel to offer a stronger competitive position in 2006 than it held in 2005 with its high performance dual-core Presler and Conroe processors and low-cost single-core Cedar Mill processor," said Thornhill.
The group's primary concern was the scale of the US government's investment in homeland security R&D, which meant that the US was "taking a lead" in the development of security "technologies and equipment which ��� could meet a number of Europe's needs", putting US multinationals in "a very strong competitive position".
did note Berkshire's "very strong financial risk profile, built on an extremely strong competitive position and very strong capital and earnings".
