The phrase "a stringent review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a thorough and strict examination or evaluation of something, such as a document, process, or performance.
Example: "The committee conducted a stringent review of the applicants' qualifications to ensure only the best candidates were selected."
Alternatives: "a rigorous assessment" or "a thorough evaluation."
A recent change in the law would subject any future logos to a stringent review by the department, he said.
It said it would launch a stringent review of recruitment, promotions, procurements and all of its financial dealings in order to root out corruption.One reason Mr Xi is keen to clean up the army is to ensure that it remains a bulwark of party rule.
Clinical studies of pain patients without a history of heavy drug use find that less than 1percentt become addicted during treatment as summarized by a stringent review by the respected Cochrane Collaboration.
"If they had looked at a 30-day time span for oil reaching shore, the risk would probably have looked a lot higher and maybe triggered a more stringent review under the Endangered Species Act," Dr. Small said.
If anything, he said, he is likely to repaint it the same purple shades because the colors are "grandfathered under landmarks" and are subject to a less stringent review.
While Mr. Safir said that none of Officer Davitt's previous shootings had generated a civilian complaint or departmental discipline, he said the sheer number of incidents had led him to order a more stringent review of all 250 police officers who have been involved in three or more shootings.
Still, calls for a more stringent review of diversion candidates in the wake of Holder's death have been largely drowned out by the broader political push to reform the criminal justice system's targeting of minorities with tough sentences for nonviolent crimes.
This was clearly influenced by the RSA symposium issue published in 2006, which may have undergone a more stringent review process due to the special focus of the issue, and also as it was published soon after the guidelines.
In applying an overly "stringent" review to that ruling, it failed to give the trial court the deference that is the hallmark of abuse of discretion review.
